Updated 22 September 2026

Editorial policy

Wridian publishes independent educational context about the Solana ecosystem. Our editorial purpose is to make technical subjects more understandable while separating documented facts, measured observations, interpretation, and opinion. We do not publish financial promises, personal recommendations, or sales claims.

1. Independence

Editorial decisions are separate from advertising review and business relationships. A sponsor cannot purchase favorable treatment, remove a correction, or dictate a conclusion. If a commercial relationship creates a meaningful conflict, it will be disclosed near the relevant content.

2. Sources

We prefer primary documentation, official repositories, technical specifications, dated public datasets, and direct statements. Secondary reporting can provide history or context but is checked against stronger sources where possible. Links are included so readers can continue their own research.

3. Verification

Technical claims are checked against documentation and, where practical, a second independent source. Numerical observations include dates and definitions. We avoid presenting a dashboard number as a universal measurement when its scope is narrow.

4. Language

We avoid guaranteed outcomes, urgency, superlatives, fear, and claims that a reader should buy or act. Terms such as “best,” “cheapest,” and “risk-free” do not belong in our editorial voice. A calm description is more useful than promotional certainty.

5. Corrections

Readers can report errors through the contact page. We review the source, decide whether a correction is warranted, and update the passage with an explanatory note when the change is material. Silent changes may be made for spelling or formatting without changing meaning.

6. Updates

Pages show the relevant 2026 context and are reviewed when sources or implementations change. A revised date does not mean every sentence has been re-researched. The change note identifies the scope of a substantive update.

7. Conflicts

Writers disclose direct relationships that could affect a subject. Personal ownership, employment, consulting, grants, or sponsorship can be relevant conflicts. A conflict does not automatically disqualify coverage, but readers deserve to know its presence.

8. Community submissions

Suggestions and guest material are checked for originality, safety, factual support, and clear authorship. Submission does not guarantee publication. We may edit for length, structure, accessibility, and clarity while preserving the submitted meaning.

9. Advertising

Advertising is labeled and visually separated from editorial work. An advertisement is not evidence for an article's claims. Commercial placement cannot alter glossary definitions or research methods.

10. Sensitive subjects

We avoid publishing private credentials, personal security details, or information that could facilitate abuse. Security discussions focus on defensive literacy and responsible reporting. We remove or revise content when a credible risk becomes apparent.

11. Corrections contact

Send the exact URL, quoted passage, proposed correction, and supporting source. The desk can be reached at +82 2-3486-7129 or at the Seoul address listed in the footer. We aim to review substantive reports within 10 working days.

12. Change log

22 September 2026: policy published for the Wridian editorial launch. Future changes will be listed here with their date and a brief description. This record supports transparency without turning the policy into a technical changelog.

Before publication, an editor identifies the central claim, the intended audience, and the evidence needed to support it. Technical descriptions are separated from interpretation, and uncertainty is stated when documentation is incomplete or competing sources disagree. A source may be dated, archived, or quoted with a short explanation so readers can understand its context.

Corrections are prioritized according to their practical effect. A factual error that could change a reader's understanding receives a visible note, while a typographical correction may be made without a public annotation. We preserve the original meaning of a corrected passage and avoid silently changing a conclusion merely because later commentary is more convenient.

Contributors should disclose a material personal, professional, or commercial interest connected with a subject they cover. Disclosure does not automatically disqualify a contributor, but it allows an editor to assess the assignment and add context for readers. Unverified allegations, private personal data, and claims based only on anonymous promotional material are not treated as sufficient evidence.

Readers may request a correction by providing the page URL, the exact statement, a source, and an explanation of the difference. We aim to acknowledge a report within five business days and complete an initial review within 30 days. A correction decision may take longer when a technical claim requires consultation of versioned documentation or multiple independent sources.

The policy was updated on 22 September 2026. Future revisions will show a new date and summarize material changes, such as a revised source standard, disclosure practice, or correction workflow. Advertising, partnership, and privacy questions remain subject to their separate pages and do not override the editorial standards described here.

Before publication, an editor identifies the central claim, the intended audience, and the evidence needed to support it. Technical descriptions are separated from interpretation, and uncertainty is acknowledged when documentation is incomplete or competing sources disagree. A source may be dated, archived, or quoted with a brief context so readers understand its scope. Sources are checked where practical, and a claim based only on rumor or anonymous promotion is not treated as sufficient evidence.

Corrections are prioritized according to their practical effect. A factual error that could change a reader's understanding receives a visible note, while a spelling or formatting correction may be made silently. We preserve the meaning of a corrected passage and avoid changing a conclusion only because later commentary is more convenient or popular.

Contributors should disclose a material personal, professional, or financial interest connected with the subject they cover. Disclosure does not automatically disqualify a contributor, but it allows an editor to assess the assignment, identify related sources, and add context for readers. Unverified allegations, sensitive personal data, and claims based only on anonymous sources are handled carefully.

Readers may request a correction through the contact page. Please include the article URL, the exact statement, the evidence or source showing the difference, and an explanation of why the change matters. We normally acknowledge a report within five business days and complete an initial review within 30 days. A correction decision may take longer when a claim requires consultation of versioned documentation or multiple independent sources.

This policy was updated on 22 September 2026. Future revisions will show a new date and summarize material changes, such as a revised source standard, contributor disclosure practice, or correction workflow. Advertising, partnership, and privacy questions remain subject to their separate pages and do not override the editorial standards described here.